From 1945, in considering an application for the exercise of the Royal prerogative of mercy, the Governor-General could refer a person’s conviction or sentence back to the appeal courts under section 406, Crimes Act 1961. By convention, the Governor-Gene

From 1995 to 1 July 2020, when the Criminal Cases Review Commission Act 2019 came into force, 173 applications for the Royal prerogative of mercy were made. 19 of the applications led to a referral back to the relevant appeal court.

In the 10 years before the establishment of the Criminal Cases Review Commission, 5 cases were referred back to the Court of Appeal. Three of the subsequent appeals were successful and the other two were, [as at 1 October 2023], waiting to be heard by the Court of Appeal. 

Sir Thomas Thorp was given access by the Ministry of Justice to Royal prerogative of mercy files for applications received between 1995 and 2002. Of these, 53 files that had been evaluated and determined were available for analysis. 7 resulted in a reference to the relevant appeal court under section 406, Crimes Act 1961, the terms of an existing reference were widened in one case, and a Ministerial inquiry was held in another. No pardons were granted, and the remainder of the applications were declined.

At the time of Sir Thomas Thorp’s study, the Ministry did not routinely collect information about the applicants’ ethnicity. However, Sir Thomas obtained details of ethnicity from 46 of the 53 files he examined, generally from charging documents and police record sheets. The ethnic breakdown of those 46 files was: 

 Māori 9% Pacific Islanders 2%

Caucasian 80% Other 9% (Thorp, 2005)

Based on Sir Thomas Thorp’s study, the three most common grounds for an application, in descending order, were: (1) newly discovered evidence; (2) police or prosecutorial misconduct (including the non-discovery of evidence); and (3) incompetence of counsel. (Thorp, 2005).

There are no factors to suggest that Māori and Pacific Islanders are less likely to be affected by miscarriages of justice than other inmates. If anything, the likelihood is the other way, as Māori and Pacific Islanders are less likely to be able to pay for the best legal advice and more likely to have difficulty instructing and communicating with counsel. (Thorp, 2005).

Timeline

2011

Circle icon Tohu bullet icon

Phillip Johnston and Jaden Knight

Phillip Johnston and Jaden Knight were convicted of arson (2004) and spent approximately nine and a half months in prison. They received payments of $146,011 and $221,936 (respectively) in compensation.

Read more
Read less

2011

Circle icon Tohu bullet icon

Aaron Farmer

Aaron Farmer was convicted of sexual violation (2005) and served approximately 2 years, 3 months of his sentence. He received a total payment of $351,575 in compensation.

Read more
Read less

2015

Circle icon Tohu bullet icon

Considerable news coverage

Considerable news coverage over the handling of miscarriages of justice in Aotearoa and calls for an independent body.

Read more
Read less

2016

Circle icon Tohu bullet icon

Teina Pora

Teina Pora was convicted in 1994, and again in 2000, on charges of murder, sexual violation by rape and aggravated burglary. In March 2015, the Privy Council quashed his convictions and did not order a retrial. He initially received $2,520,949 as compensation for his wrongful conviction and imprisonment (2016), which was subsequently increased to $3,509,048 to account for inflation (2017).

Read more
Read less

2016

Circle icon Tohu bullet icon

David Bain

David Bain was convicted of murder and served approximately 13 years in prison. Because of the report by Hon Ian Callinan AC QC stating that Bain had not sufficiently proven his innocence, no declaration of innocence or compensation was awarded to him. Bain and his advisors disputed Callinan's conclusions and planned to legally contest the report. In response, the Crown decided to provide an ex-gratia payment of $925,000 to Mr Bain. This recognised the time involved and expenses incurred by Mr Bain during the compensation process, and the desirability of avoiding further litigation.

Read more
Read less

2017

Circle icon Tohu bullet icon

Agreement to establish a Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC)

Following the 2017 general election, the incoming coalition government announced its commitment to establish a Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC).

Read more
Read less

2018

Circle icon Tohu bullet icon

Tyson Redman

Tyson Redman was convicted of wounding and injuring (2007), and spent two and a half years in prison. Mr Redman's convictions were referred to the Court of Appeal in October 2012. In December 2013, the Court of Appeal quashed these convictions and did not order a retrial. He received a total payment of $551,017.16 in compensation.

Read more
Read less

2018

Circle icon Tohu bullet icon

Introduction of CCRC Bill

The Criminal Cases Review Commission bill was introduced to New Zealand Parliament in 2018, which enacted its final reading in November 2019.

Read more
Read less

2020

Circle icon Tohu bullet icon

Te Rōpū Whakahau

Te Rōpū Whakahau | Establishment Advisory Group was established, comprising of individuals from diverse backgrounds and perspectives to provide counsel to ensure that the structure and functions of the CCRC aligned with the Criminal Cases Review Commission Act 2019. Colin Carruthers KC was appointed as Kaikōmihana Matua | Chief Commissioner of the CRRC.

Read more
Read less

2022

Circle icon Tohu bullet icon

Mr A

Mr A was convicted of driving whilst disqualified (2013) and served approximately 6 and a half months’ imprisonment. He received a total payment of $108,037 in compensation.

Read more
Read less

2020

Circle icon Tohu bullet icon

Te Kāhui Tātari Ture

Te Kāhui Tātari Ture | Criminal Cases Review Commission came into force on 1 July 2020. The Commission received its first application on the same day. 

Read more
Read less